|
|
townhall.com
Oliver North (back to story)
April 6, 2001
CHINESE CHECKMATE
"Speak softly and carry a
big stick." --Theodore Roosevelt, 1901
WASHINGTON, D.C. --We've tried diplomatic recognition, trade and calling them
"strategic partners." We've sold them our most sensitive technology and let them
steal what they couldn't buy. We've even offered to buy 24 million dollars worth
of their black berets and make the entire U.S. Army wear them.
What do we get in return? An intercepted and damaged U.S. Navy EP3-II
surveillance aircraft being disassembled piece by piece by communist Chinese
intelligence specialists and 24 U.S. military personnel held in "protective
custody" by Beijing in flagrant disregard of international law. Add to that 21
other American citizens being held on allegations ranging from petty theft to
espionage. One might conclude that the nice folks running the People's Republic
of China really don't like us. But that's not what the "Blame America First
Crowd" is saying.
The stand-off over the fate of our airmen and aircraft drove defenders of the
despotic regime in Beijing into high dudgeon. Not surprisingly, most of them are
long-term apologists for the Clinton-Gore administration's fatally flawed
policies that led to the PRC's current spate of provocation, repression and
aggression. And the blow-dried air-heads of "broadcast journalism" proved
willing to give these appeasers plenty of face time.
Former Clinton ambassador to Beijing Jim Sasser counseled the Bush
administration to "keep a moderate tone" and avoid "harsh rhetoric." His
predecessor, Stapleton Roy, our representative in "The Forbidden City" from 1991
until 1995, urged "patience" in dealing with despots who flout international
conventions. Ambassador Marc Ginsburg, a "foreign policy advisor to the
Democratic National Committee," suggested that the "cowboys and cold warriors"
in the Bush administration were "exacerbating the situation."
The masters of the media joined the chorus of criticism. Even before we knew
the location and condition of the 22 Navy personnel, an Air Force officer and a
U.S. Marine, one cable-network newsreader insinuated that the incident was a
case of "the U.S. being caught with its hand in the cookie jar." Another
allegedly experienced reporter noted that U.S. Navy destroyers, dispatched to
search for the missing Chinese Air Force pilot who caused the accident, were
"threatening."
Others, parroting Beijing's line, have left the impression that U.S. military
aircraft flying in international airspace are "provocative." Talking heads
billed as "military experts" and "former intelligence specialists" critiqued the
commander of the EP-3 for failing to "ditch" the aircraft -- as though its
equipment was more valuable than the lives of the crew. And every network rushed
to put on the air anxious relatives of detained crewmembers who understandably
want an "official U.S. apology" to free their loved ones.
Despite the criticism, the Bush administration has stuck steadfastly to Teddy
Roosevelt's admonition regarding words and sticks. Based on what I've learned
about this incident, it's the right approach.
My sources tell me that the EP-3 now being pawed over by the People's
Liberation Army (PLA) on Hainan Island was on a mission to collect information
on the most advanced warship in the red Chinese navy, a Russian-made
Sovremenny-class destroyer and its lethal Sunburn sea-skimming anti-ship
missiles -- a major threat to U.S. aircraft carriers. The U.S. surveillance
plane was in international airspace when two F-8 fighters launched from
Guangdong Province tried to drive it away from the destroyer with a series of
close passes -- a dangerous tactic that began last year yet was never divulged
by the Clinton administration.
But last Sunday, one of the F-8 pilots came too close, struck the EP-3 and
crashed into the South China Sea. According to a source at Hawaii's CINCPAC
Headquarters, when the badly damaged U.S. aircraft broadcast an international
distress "Mayday" and tried to turn east toward safety, the other F-8 may have
opened fire with its machine guns, forcing the EP-3 to land on Hainan Island.
While enroute, the crew, in accord with instructions, gutted the innards of the
sophisticated reconnaissance plane to limit what PLA intelligence experts could
learn when they combed through its wrecked equipment.
In Washington, Beijing's unwillingness to turn over our aircrew and aircraft
galvanized a high-level national security review of China policy options that
had been stimulated by information provided by Col. Xu Junping -- a senior
member of the PLA general staff who recently defected to the U.S. Already
alarmed by the intelligence provided by Xu, Bush administration national
security experts were further troubled by Beijing's efforts, as the crisis
dragged on, to coerce the Japanese government to ban any more such surveillance
flights from Kadena Air Base on Okinawa. All this prompted the drafting of a
short list of "Biejing Bargaining Chips."
Alternatives under discussion are said to include: ending
military-to-military exchanges; powering-up Radio Free Asia; challenging
Beijing's bid for WTO membership and the 2008 Summer Olympics; re-activating
COCOM to review licenses for all technology sales; revoking Permanent Normal
Trade Relations and commercial port leases on U.S. territory; encouraging
Taiwan's request for WTO membership; canceling a planned presidential visit to
Beijing; and booting out the red Chinese scientists who, amazingly enough, still
have access to our super-sensitive nuclear labs. Already on the table before the
EP-3 incident: selling Taiwan four Aegis Class destroyers and the Patriot
Advanced Capability-3 ballistic missile defense systems our allies want to buy.
There's another item that ought to be included. Cancel the purchase order for
those black berets being made in communist China. After this, no U.S. Army
soldier should ever have to wear one.
©2001 Creators Syndicate, Inc.
townhall.com
|
|