The History of Jewish Human Sacrifice
At the dawn of civilization, the blood rite, in which human blood is drunk from
the body of a still-living victim, was known to many tribes. However, only one
people, that has never progressed beyond the Stone
Age, has continued to practice the blood rite and ritual murder. This people
are known to the world as Jews. Arnold Toynbee, a noted scholar, has called the
Jews "a fossil people."
In so doing, he must have been aware of the fact that they still practice
ritual murder and the drinking of human blood (especially Christian blood). As
a scholar, he could not have failed to note the many attested incidents of this
practice of the Jews, for hundreds of example of ritual murder by the Jews are
cited in official Catholic books, in every European literature, and in the
court records of all the European nations.
It is the official historian of the Jews, (Josef Kastein, in his History of the
Jews, who gives the underlying reason for this barbaric custom. On page 173, he
says, "According to the primeval Jewish view, the blood was the seat of
the soul."
Thus it was not the heart which was the seat of the soul, according to the
stone-age Jews, but the blood itself. They believed that by drinking the blood
of a Christian victim who was perfect in every way, they could overcome their
physical short comings and become as powerful as the intelligent civilized
beings among whom they had formed their parasitic
communities. Because of this belief, the Jews are known to have practiced
drinking blood since they made their first appearance in history.
Jewish Murder Plan Against
White Christians Exposed
The Murderous People: The Jews are under a terrible suspicion the world over,
and for good reason. Anyone who does not know this,
does not understand the Jewish problem. Anyone who merely see
the Jews as "a tribe which secures its existence with exchange and old
trousers, and whose uniforms are the long noses," is being misled. But
anyone who knows the monstrous accusation which has been raised against the jews since the beginning of time, will view these people in
a different light. He will begin to see not only a peculiar, strangely
fascinating nation; but criminals, murderers, and devils in human form. He will
be filled with holy anger and hatred against these people of Satan. (John 8:44)
The suspicion under which the Jews are held is murder. They are charged with
enticing White Christian Children (and sometimes blacks to keep them under
control - and if necessary they will run black children down in the streets
with automobiles to show the blacks their power, and that the blacks had better
mind their manners or the same will happen again and again. We all witnessed
this a few years ago in
Ritual Murder
The knowledge of Jewish ritual murder is thousands of years old. It is as old
as the Jews themselves. Non-Jews have passed the knowledge of it from
generation to generation, and it has been passed down to us thorough writings.
It is known of throughout the nation. Knowledge of ritual murder can be found
in even the most secluded rural villages. The grand-father told his grand
children, who passed it on to his children, and his children's children, until
we have inherited the knowledge today from them.
It is also befalling other nations. The accusation is loudly raised
immediately, anywhere int he world, where a body is found which bears the marks
of ritual murder. This accusation is raised only against the Jews. Hundreds and
hundreds of nations, tribes, and races live on this earth, but no one ever
thought to accuse them of the planned murdering of children, or to call them
murderers. All nations have hurled this accusation only against the Jews.
And many great men have raised such an accusation. Martin Luther wrote in his
book "Of The Jews And Their Lies:"
"They stabbed and pierced the body of the young boy Simon of Trent. They
have also murdered other children...The sun never did shine on a more
bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they who imagine to be the people of God,
and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. Jesus
Christ, the Almighty Preacher from
"He (Martin Luther) accused them (the Jews) of all those fictitious crimes
which had made
The Struggle of Der Sturmer: The only newspaper in
Its workers, most of all its editor Julius Streicher,
were dragged into court hundreds of times. They were convicted, punished and
locked into prison. Der Sturmer came to know the Jew from the confession which
Dr. Conrad Alberti-Sittenfeld, a Jew, wrote in 1899 in No. 12 of the magazine
Gesellschaft:
"One of the most dangerous Jewish qualities is the brutal, direct barbaric
intolerance. A worse tyranny cannot be practiced than that which the Jewish
clique practices. If you try to move against this Jewish clique, they will,
without hesitating, use brutal methods to overcome you. Mainly the Jew tries to
destroy his enemy in the mental area, by which he takes his material gain away,
and undermines his civil existence. The vilest of all forms of retaliation, the
boycott, is characteristically Jewish."
The Der Sturmer was not stopped for several years. Just in
1). Der Sturmer was not fighting against the Jewish religion; but against the
Jewish people.
2). The Talmud and Schulchan aruch are not religious books. They have no right
to be protected under the religious paragraphs.
3). The laws of the Talmud which are quoted and
published in Der Sturmer are exact quotations from the Talmud.
4). The laws of the Talmud are in harsh contradiction
to German morals.
5). The Jews of today are being taught from the Talmud.
With this verdict Der Sturmer brought about the first big breach in the
Jewish/Roman Administration of Justice, which was given the job before the
National Socialist revolution to protect Judaism and its government. The jews, of course, became greatly agitated about this. But for
De Sturmer this success was an omen of the victory yet to come. Of course, Der
Sturmer did not stop half way. It knew what had to be done. It was their duty,
or so they believed. To frustrate the gigantic murder plot of
Judaism against humanity. It was their duty! To brand
this nation before the world, to uncover its crimes and to render it harmless.
It was their duty! To free the world from this national pest
and parasitic race. Der Sturmer would fulfill its mission. It would, for
a time, light up the darkness with the truth which shall eventually rule the
world. And it would always direct itself according to the following proverb:
"He who knows the truth and does not speak it truly is a miserable
creature."
The Laws of The Talmud: If one wishes to learn and understand why the Jews can
commit such insane crimes as ritual murder, they must know the Jewish secrets.
They must know the teachings of the Torah (The Talmud), and the Schulchan
aruch. These laws and teachings are proof that the Jews feel themselves
superior to all nations, that it has declared war on all other races, and that
it is the sworn enemy of the whole of non-Jewish humanity. Even Tactius, the
Roman historian who lived shortly after Christ (55-120) A.D., wrote:
"The Jews are a race that hate the gods and
mankind. Their laws are in opposition to those of all mortals. They despise
what to us is holy. Their laws condone them in committing acts which horrify
us." (Historian V. 3-8)
The Jew knows that when the non-Jewish world knows his laws and sees through
his plans that he is lost. Therefore, by threat of death he forbids their
translation and publication. A well known Jewish scholar (Dibre David) writes:
"If the Gentiles (non-Jews) knew what we are teaching against them, they
would kill us."
The Jewish secret laws are based on the fundamental principle which states:
Only the Jew is human. In contrast all non-Jews are animals,
they are beasts in human form. Anything is permitted against them. The Jew may
lie to, cheat and steal from them. He may rape and murder them. There are
hundreds of passages in the Talmud which the non-jews are described as animals.
Some of them are as follows:
1). "The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans.
They are beasts." (Talmud: Baba Mezia 114b)
2). "The Akum (Negro) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor
the dog more than the Akum." (Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30)
3). "Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in
human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therefore
he will be served by animals in human form." (Midrasch
Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855)
4). "A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal." (Coschen Hamischpat 405)
5). "The souls of non-Jews come from impure spirits and are called
pigs." (Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b)
6). "Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they
compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human." (Schene Luchoth Haberith,
p. 250b)
So that the Jew will never forget that he is dealing with animals, he is
reminded by eating, by death, and eve by sexual intercourse constantly. For The
Talmud teaches:
1). "If you eat with a non-Jew, it is the same as eating with a dog."
(Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)
2). "If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not
express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell to the Jew: 'God will replace your
loss,' just as if one of his oxen or asses had died." (Jore
Dea 377, 1)
3). "Sexual intercourse between non-Jews is like intercourse
between animals." (Sanhedrin 74b)
It is written in the Talmud about the murder of the non-Jew:
1). "It is permitted to take the body and the life of a non-Jew." (Sepher Ikkarim IIIc, 25)
2). "It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah (Talmud -
Sanhedrin 59b). The Christians
belong to the denying ones of the Torah (Talmud)." (Coschen
Hamischpat 425, Hagah 425, 5)
3). "Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jew), is
doing the same as making a sacrifice to God." (Bammidber Raba, c 21 &
Jalkut 772)
These laws of the Talmud were given to the Jews over 3000 years ago. They are
just as valid today as they were back then. This is how the Jews are taught
from childhood. The results of this stands before us.
It is Jewish Ritual Murder.
The Jews' Bloody History: The Jew is not only the murderer of the Christians in
theory. His history proves that he practices what he preaches. The history of
the Jewish people is an unbroken chain of mass murders and blood-baths. It
started before Christ and has continued with Linen, Trotsky, Sinowjeff, Stalin
and etc., up to today:
1). The extreme to which the Jews will go was shown in Persia where the Jew
Mordecai and the Jewess Esther had 75,800 Persians murdered. They hanged the
Persian King Xerxes' minister Haman along with his ten sons. They celebrated
this bloody victory and to this day still celebrate it during the Feast of
Purim. (Book of Esther 9:6)
After Christ in the years 115-117, on the
The Jews revolted in
"'The Jewish Establishment": 'In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of
the New York Times was in Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted
to be covered. To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was
famine in
In Jewish-Bolshevik Soviet Russia mass murders are even now (1997) are being
carried out. The executioners are mostly Jewish men and women. In inventing new
methods of torture the Jews are past masters. To let Christians die under
torture give them the greatest pleasure. English reporters write that the
Chinese executioners frequently would not carry out their tortures and
executions; they shouldered and could not continue. Therefore, Jews and Jewesses
took their place.
"The Jews were now free to indulge in their most fervent fantasies of mass
murder of helpless victims. Christians were dragged from their beds, tortured
and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces, bit by bit, while others were branded
with hot irons, their eyes poked out to induce unbearable pain. Others were
placed in boxes with only their heads, hands and legs sticking out. Then hungry
rats were placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were nailed to
the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left hanging until they died
of exhaustion. Others were chained to the floor and left hanging until they
died of exhaustion.
"Others were chained to the floor and hot lead poured into their mouths.
Many were tied to horses and dragged through the streets of the city, while
Jewish mobs attacked them with rocks and kicked them to death. Christian
mothers were taken to the public square and their babies snatched from their
arms. A red Jewish terrorist would take the baby, hold it by the feet, head
downward and demand that the Christian mother deny Christ. If she would not, he
would toss the baby into the air, and another member of the mob would rush
forward and catch it on the tip of his bayonet.
"Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out
of their bodies. There were many places of public execution in
The history of the Jews is written in the blood of Christians.
"Thanks to the terrible power of our International Banks, we have forced
the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews,
since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are
the Jews' Harvest: The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100-million
Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars, and the end is
not yet." (Rabbi Reichorn, speaking at the funeral of Grand Rabbi Simeon
Ben-Judah, 1869, Henry Ford also noted that: 'It was a Jew
who said, 'Wars are the Jews' harvest'; but no harvest is so rich as civil
wars.' The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem, Vol. III, p. 180)
The history of the Jews is written with Christian blood. Their history proves
that the Jew is extremely cruel and at the same time a
coward. The Jew is not a born soldier; he is a born sadist and murderer. (John
8:44)
The Law of Human Sacrifice: For a long time the newspaper Der Sturmer
endeavored to find the actual law of ritual murder, the law of human sacrifice.
It finally succeeded in doing so. In a trial in which Julius Streicher and Karl
Holz were being tried (because of "offending the Jewish Religious
Society") it was proposed that they call as witness Dr. Erich Bischoff.
Dr. Bischoff appeared.
He was the leading German expert on the laws of the Talmud. He had dedicated
his entire life to the study of the Jewish law books. Dr. Bischoff brought with
him a translation of a secret Jewish law, which clarified with one stroke the
question of ritual murder. It comes from the book of Sohar. This book is
considered to be holy by the Jews.
"You are right! This reproach of yours, which I feel for certain is at the
bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified; upon this common
ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any
accusation of promoting Race Hatred...We [Jews] have erred, my friend, we have
most grievously erred. And if there is any truth in our error, 3,000, 2,000
maybe 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness, a madness
which will produce even greater misery and wider anarchy. I confess it to you
openly and sincerely and with sorrow...We who have posed as the saviors of the
world...We are nothing but the world's seducers, it's destroyers, it's
incinderaries, it's executioners...we who promised to lead you to heaven, have
finally succeeded in leading you to a new hell...There has been no progress,
least of all moral progress...and it is our morality which prohibits all
progress, and what is worse -- it stands in the way of every future and natural
reconstruction in this ruined world of ours...I look at this world, and shudder
at its ghastliness: I shudder all the ore, as I know the spiritual authors of
all this ghastliness..." The eastern Jews especially conform to its laws. In the book of Sohar (a companion of the Talmud). The
English translation related:
"Further there is a Law concerning the slaughter of foreigners, who are
the same as beasts. This slaughter is to be carried out in a lawfully valid
manner. The ones who do not follow the Jewish Religious Law have to be offered
to God as a sacrifice. It is to them that Psalm 44:22 refers:
?Yea, for thy sake are we killed all the day long; we are counted as
sheep for the slaughter." (Thikunne Sohar, edition Berdiwetsch 88b)
Dr. Erich Bischoff declared himself ready to offer an
opinion on this expressed law of ritual murder. However he was rejected. He was
not admitted by the court for "fear of bias."
The Catholic priest Dr. Gottsberger took his place. The defendants handed him
the above mentioned law in Hebrew and German. Dr. Gottsberger was embarrassed
and confused.
After a long consideration he stated that he would not be able to deliver an
opinion on the law of human sacrifice. Due to this Julius Streicher and Karl
Holz were sentenced to several months imprisonment.
Later on, however, Dr. Bischoff (in the trial of 30th October
This translation and publication of the law of human sacrifice is the greatest
blow ever struck the Jews in this controversy. This Law commands the Jews to
Butcher Christians and non-Jews. This is to be done in a "
Jewish Confessions: A further and irrefutable proof of the
existence of Jewish Ritual Murder are the numerous Jewish confessions.
They come from trials, voluntary statements and from confessions by former
rabbis. The confessions were made in two court cases. One of them took place in
Trent in 1475, and the other one in
The voluntary statement was made by the young Jewess Ben Noud who made it to
the French Count Durfort-Civrac. The confessions were made by the following
rabbis who truly converted to Christianity: Drach and Goschler, Fra Sifto of
On page 19 of this work the Jew Teofito confesses how he was initiated into the
knowledge of Ritual Murder. And how the Jews for thousands of years have
concealed it from the Christian and non-Jewish world. Teofito writes:
"This secret of the blood is not know to all the Jews, but only to the
Chakam (doctors) or the rabbis and the scholars, who therefore carry the title ?Conservatori del mistero
"And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hope of their hearts is
directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us Christians
as they dealt with the heathen in
"Thereafter followed the curses and threats of punishment if I should ever
reveal this secret to anyone, neither my mother nor my sister nor brothers or
future wife; but only to one of my future sons who was the most
wise, eager, and most suitable. In this way the secret shall be
inherited from father to son until the farthest descendant."
This is a part of the monk and former Chief Rabbi Teofito's confession. From
other confessions and admissions there is a remarkable agreement on the following
points:
1). The laws demand the Jews to butcher non-Jews from time to time. (The Laws
of The Talmud and the Law of Human Sacrifice)
2). The sacrifice shall take place chiefly:
a. At the Purim Festival
b. At the Passover Festival
It is demanded of the Jews to butcher an adult
Christian if possible, or a black non-Jew for the Purim and to butcher a child
for the Passover. The child must not be over seven years old and must die in
agony.
3). The blood of the victims must be violently
drained. It is to be used at Passover in wine and in the Massen (bread). What
this means is that a small part of the blood is mixed into the dough and the
wine. The procedure is to be performed by the Jewish father.
4). The procedure takes place in the following manner: The father pours a few
drops of fresh or dried and powdered blood into a glass, dips a finger of his
left hand into it and sprinkles (blesses) everything which is on the table,
saying: "Dam Issardia chynim heroff Jsyn prech harbe hossen mashus pohorus."
(Erod,
5). The ritual blood is also used other ways:
a. The young married couple is given a hard boiled egg wich is seasoned with
dried blood which as been pulverized.
b. It is also given to pregnant women in the same way in order to ease their
child birth.
c. It is mixed with egg-white, put on a linen cloth and placed on the chest of
dead Jews so that they will enter heaven without atonement.
d. At circumcision powdered blood will be sprinkled on the wound so it will
heal quickly.
e. Dip fruits or vegetables into it and then eat them, (Schuldran arch Orach
cajjim 158,4) or
f. A dying or decrepit Jew can be saved with it. (Jore Deah 155,3)
The Jews have a superstition which originates from the Orient. They believe
that old people can become younger by drinking the blood of young children.
6). The remainder of the blood is preserved with the greatest of care by the
local rabbis and sold in small bottles by appointed wandering Jews at
neighboring synagogues. This same rabbi certifies that the blood is genuine
pure Christian blood.
7). The Ritual Murder and the Blood Mystery are acknowledge by all Talmudic
Jews, and practiced whenever possible. The Jew believes that he will be
"atoned" by it.
The Hurons, the Canadians and the Iroquois were philosophers of humanitarianism
in comparison to the jews. These are seven Jewish
customs and regulations were established not only in the trials from
Civilized people find this practice so abhorrent that they cannot believe it,
despite the hundreds of pages of evidence against the Jews which are found in
court records. Historical records for five thousand years have provided
irrefutable proof of the blood guilt of the Jews.
As other people became more civilized, the blood rite became a symbolic one,
and a symbolic form of blood, usually wine, was drunk during the ritual, while
the barbaric practice of killing a victim was given up altogether. Only one
group, the Jewish cult, has continued to practice the blood rite in modern
times.
Authorities on the blood rite, such as the noted Catholic scholar, James E.
Bulger, state that the Jews practice the blood drinking rite because they are a
parasitic people who must partake of the blood of the gentile host if they are
to continue to survive. Bulger also states that the drinking of blood is a rite
of black magic which enables the Jewish rabbis to predict the future as the
blood of their non-Jewish victim courses through their veins.
Therefore, Jewish leaders from time to time entice a non-Jewish child,
preferably male, and from six to eight years old. According to Jewish ritual,
the non-Jewish (preferably a Christian child) child must be perfectly formed,
intelligent, and without blemish. He also must be younger than the age of
puberty, because the Jews believe that the blood becomes impure after the
beginning of puberty.
When the (Christian) child is enticed into the synagogue, or, if the Jews are
under observation, into some more secret gathering place, the kidnaped child is
tied down onto a table, stripped, and its body pierced with sharp ritual knives
in the identical places where the nails entered the body of Christ on the
stake. As the blood is drained into cups, the Jewish leaders raise the cups and
drink from them, while the child slowly expires in an atmosphere of unrelieved
horror.
The Jews call down curses upon Christ and on all the non-Jewish people, and
celebrate their symbolic victory over them as they continue to drink the blood
of the dying child. Only by performing this rite, so the Jews believe, can they
continue to survive and prosper among their non-Jewish host.
The ancient Khazar Jews along with others of that Near East era followed a
common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to burn a young person upon
an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the Bible mentions this practice
and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums would be beaten loudly to drown
out the cries of the children being burned alive.
In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to drown
out their screams.
The Carthaginians also were worshipers of Baal and sacrificed children on a
massive scale. When faced with defeat in
Even though God commanded circumcision, there is no way a reading of Scripture
shows that God intended that the procedure turn into a bloody ritual. Besides
that, it seems apparent that when Christ nailed the blood ordinances to the
cross, he also nailed the circumcision to the cross. "Behold, I Paul say
unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing."
(Galatians 5:2)
"The mode of government which is the most propitious
for the full development of the class war, is the
demagogic regime which is equally favorable to the two fold intrigues of
Finance and Revolution. When this struggle is let loose in a violent form, the
leaders of the masses are kings, but money is god: the demagogues are the
masters of the passions of the mob, but the financiers are the master of the
demagogues, and it is in the last resort the widely spread riches of the
country, rural property, real estate, which, for as long as they last, must pay
for the movement.
When the demagogues prosper amongst the ruins of social and political order,
and overthrown traditions, gold is the only power which counts, it is the
measure of everything; it can do everything and reigns without hindrance in
opposition to all countries, to the detriment of the city of the nation, or of
the empire which are finally ruined.
In doing this do not financiers work against themselves?
It may be asked: in destroying the established order do not they destroy the
source of all riches? This is perhaps true in the end; but whilst states which
count their years by human generations, are obliged in order to insure their
existence to conceive and conduct a far-sighted policy in view of a distant
future, Finance which gets its living from what is present and tangible, always
follows a short-sighted policy, in view of rapid results and success without
troubling itself about the morrows of history." Make no mistake about it, The god of the Jews is not the God of Abraham, Isaac and
Jacob/Israel. And if it were the same God -- the
manner in which the Jews worship is administered is an abomination in the eyes
of the Lord our God. Many people think this sort of thing may have happened in
the past but did not exist after the Babylonian captivity.
However, from the account of Dio Cassius in the 78th Book of his history,
Chapter 32, written in 117 A.D. comes the following:
"Then the Jews in Cyrene [on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa]
choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and Devoured
[ate] their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins,
and sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts
and others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000
were killed. In
Following is an expose on Jewish Ritual Murder which is currently being
conducted just as it has for centuries.
Jewish Ritual Murder
On
Jews Protest Sacrifice Tale on Oprah Show
New York Times News Service
"Hundreds of television viewers and the leaders of
several Jewish and civil liberties organizations have protested allegations on
a popular talk show last week that some Jews practice ritual killing of
children. The allegations were made by a guest using the pseudonym Rachel on
'The Oprah Winfrey Show,' a widely viewed syndicated talk show. During the
program, broadcast Monday, Winfrey introduced the guest as someone who was
undergoing long- term psychiatric ("The Jews are more subject to diseases
of the nervous system than the other races and peoples among which they dwell.
Hysteria and neurasthenia appear to be most frequent. Some physicians of large
experience among the Jews have even gone so far as to state that most of them
are neurasthenic and hysterical." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. IX,
(1905), p. 225); "Idiocy and imbecility are found comparatively more often
among Jews than among non-Jews...The Mongolian type of idiocy is also very
frequently observed among Jews...Among the Jews the proportion of insane has been
observed to be very large...Jews are more liable to acute psychoses of early
age than are non-Jews." (The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI, (1904), p. 556,
603-04)) treatment for a multiple personality
disorder. The woman told Winfrey that she had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of
children and had been a victim of ritualistic abuse.
"The guest also said of such practices: 'there's other
Jewish families across the country. It's not just my family.' The
assertions were made during a program that focused on the cult murders of at
least 13 people whose bodies were found last month near
"Harpo Productions Inc., denied Winfrey had acted irresponsibly in
broadcasting the interview since she had emphasized on the show that the guest
spoke only for herself. He added that Winfrey and her producers would meet with
representatives of the Jewish and civil liberties groups next week in
"The woman responded: 'Right. When I was very young, I was forced to
participate in that, and which I had to sacrifice an infant.' The guest was
repeatedly identified by Winfrey as being Jewish. At one point, the woman
asserted that {Jewish} ritual sacrifices occurred in other Jewish families
around the country and that they were known to the Police."
Although all Jews are aware of the blood rite and its importance to the Jewish
cult, only the most important Jewish leaders, the rabbis and the wealthiest
members of the Jewish community, are allowed to participate in the
blood-drinking rite.
Kastein states, on page 173, that the ordinary Jews are forbidden to
participate in the rite. One reason for this is the fact that the practice of
ritual murder is fraught with danger for the entire Jewish Community. Most
uprisings against the Jews during the past two thousand years have stemmed from
the discovery of this practice, and the resulting attempts of the non-Jews to
punish the Jews for murdering non-Jewish children.
The principal reason that this crime is so often discovered,
is that the naked, pierced body of the child, once it has been drained of
blood, must be thrown on a trash heap. The Jewish rite forbids burial of the
body, even though this would conceal all evidence of their crime. The Talmud,
the Holy Book of the Jews, defines all non-Jews as beasts, and by Jewish law,
the burial of beasts is forbidden. Therefore, the Jews try to conceal their
crime by throwing the corpse of the murdered child down an abandoned well,
where it may not be discovered, or by hiding it in some manner which will not
constitute burial.
In many cases, the body is discovered, and then the Jews either are attacked by
the non-Jews, or they spend thousands of dollars bribing witnesses and
officials, and attempting to frame some gentile as a "sex murderer."
Bribery and intimidation of public officials and newspapermen is always the
first step in this campaign. In the
Could Jewish Ritual Murder Still Exist?
At one time or another the Jews have been expelled
from every country in
I know well that they deny everything, but it all agrees with the judgment of
Christ, that they are poisonous, bitter, vengeful, spiteful serpents,
assassins, and devil's children, who secretly stab and do injury because they
are not able to do it publicly Purim Murder: The ritual murder at Purim is
committed against adult Christians. Fresh strong men and women are preferred.
The Purim festival is celebrated annually by the jews
in February or March. It is in commemoration of the 75,000 Persians murdered by
the Jews. This massacre occurred under the Persian king Ahasuers (Xerxes). He
had a minister (Haman) who recognized the Jewish danger and wanted to expel the
Jews. The king's Jewish whore Esther persuaded him instead to hang Haman and
his ten sons. After that came the murdering of the 75,000 Persians under the
leadership of the Jew Mordecai. The following day the Jews celebrated with
joyous festivities which are observed as the "Feast of Purim" even
today.
At this festival the Jews usually become completely drunk. This occurs
particularly at meetings of Orthodox Jews. During these orgies plays are staged
in which the murder of Ham is re-created by the Jews. An effigy of
"Haman" is put on the stage and is hanged while the Jews curse and
cast-spells (directed against the "Goyim"). The Talmud commands the
Jews to cry out aloud: "May Haman and the Gentiles (non-Jews) be cursed. May Mordecai and all the Jews be blessed." (Orach Cajjim, 690,16)
In
The Jew Moscho poisoned him so that he would never tell about the Purim Feast.
The case was brought to trial, and the jew Moscho was
sentenced to death. (The documents from this trial concerning the Purim
Festival were kept by the authorities at Kammetz until the Bolshevik
revolution. They were then destroyed by the Jews) The accusation was that
during the Jewish feasts of Purim and/or Passover extremist Hassidic Orthodox
Jewish sects would sacrifice a Christian youth for his blood. It was then dried
and the powder mixed into triangular cakes or bread for eating in order for the
Jews to gain atonement in the eyes of God. It is possible that Purim blood
might sometimes have been held over for the Passover.
We are told by James Frazer in his Golden Bough: If the Jewish festival of
Purim was, as I have attempted to show, directly descended either from the
Sacaea or from some other festival, of which the central feature was the
sacrifice of a man in the character of god, we should expect to find traces of
human sacrifice lingering about it in one or other of these mitigated forms to
which I have just referred.
This expectation is fully borne out by the facts. For from a
early time it has been customary with the Jews at the feast of Purim to burn or
otherwise destroy effigies of Haman. The practice was well known under the
We learn from the decree that the custom gave great offence to the Christians,
who regarded it as a blasphemous parody of the central mystery of their own
religion, little suspecting that it was nothing but a continuation, in a milder
form, of a rite that had probably been celebrated in the East long ages before
the birth of Christ.
Apparently the custom long survived the publication of the edict, for in a form
of abjuration which the Greek church imposed on Jewish converts and which seems
to date from the tenth century, the renegade is made to speak as follows:
"I curse also those who celebrate the festival of the so-called Mordecai
on the first Sabbath (Saturday) of the Christian fast, and who nail Haman
forsooth to the tree, attaching to it the symbol of the cross and burning him
along with it, while they heap all sorts of imprecations and curses on the
Christians." (Fr. Cumont, "Une Formule grecque de renonciation au
judaïsme," Wiener Studien, xxiv. (1902) p. 468.
The "Christian fast" referred to in the formula is no doubt Lent. The
mention of the Jewish Sabbath (the Christian Saturday) raises a difficulty,
which has been pointed out by the editor, Franz Cumont, in a note (p. 470):
"The festival of Purim was celebrated on the 14th of Adar, that is, in
February or March, about the beginning of the Christian Lent; but that festival,
the date of which is fixed in the Jewish calendar, does not always fall on a
Saturday. Either the author made a mistake or the civil authority obliged the
Jews to transfer their rejoicing to a Sabbath" (Saturday)).
A Jewish account of the custom as it was observed in Babylonia and Persia in
the tenth century of our era runs as follows:
"It is customary in Babylonia and Elam for boys to make an effigy
resembling Haman; this they suspend on their roofs, four or five days before
Purim. On Purim day they erect a bonfire, and cast the effigy into its midst,
while the boys stand round about it jesting and singing. And they have a ring
suspended in the midst of the fire, which (ring) they hold and wave from one
side of the fire to the other." (Israel Abrahams, The Book of Delight and
other Papers (
That the ring waved over the fire was an emblem of the sun, and that the
kindling of the Purim fires was originally a ceremony of imitative magic to
ensure a supply of solar light and heat) Again, the Arab historian Albîrûnî,
who wrote in the year 1000 A.D., informs us that at Purim the Jews of his time
rejoiced greatly over the death of Haman, and that they made figures which they
beat and burned, "imitating the burring of Haman."
The Jews are firmly united in spite of their dispersal. They are governed by
unknown elders...Even now every town has it's own
judge, every province its rabbi, and all are subordinate to an unknown leader,
who resides in
During the Middle Ages the Italian Jews celebrated
Purim in a lively fashion which has been compared by their own historians to
that of the Carnival. The children used to range themselves in rows opposite
each other and pelt one another with nuts, while grown-up people rode on
horseback through the streets with pine branches in their hands or blew
trumpets and made merry round a puppet representing Haman, which was set on a
platform or scaffold and then solemnly burnt on a pyre. (M. Büdemann,
Geschichte des Erziehungswesens und der Cultur der abendländischen Juden
(Vienna, 1880-1888), ii. 211 sq. ; I. Abrahams, Jewish
Life in the Middle Ages (London, 1896), pp. 260 sq)
In the eighteenth century the Jews of Frankfort used at Purim to make pyramids
of thin wax candles, which they set on fire; also they fashioned images of
Haman and his wife out of candles and burned them on the reading-desk in the
synagogue. (This is the view of H. Graetz (Geschichte der Juden, iv. Leipsic, 1866, pp. 393 sq) and Dr. M.R. James (Life and
Miracles of St. William of Norwich (Cambridge, 1896), by A. Jessopp and M.R.
James, pp. Lxiii, sq))
Now, when we consider the close correspondence in character as well as in date
between the Jewish Purim and the Christian Carnival, and remember further that
the effigy of Carnival, which is now destroyed at this merry season, had
probably its prototype in a living man who was put to a violent death in the
character of Saturn at the Saturnalia, analogy of itself would suggest that in
former times the Jews, like the Babylonians, from whom they appear to have
derived their Purim, may at one time have burned, hanged, or crucified a real
man in the character of Haman. There are some positive grounds for thinking
that this was so.
The early church historian Socrates informs us that at Inmestar, a town among
themselves, in the course of which they played many foolish pranks. In the year
416 A.D., being heated with wine, they carried these sports further than usual
and began deriding Christians and even Christ himself, and to give the more
zest to their mockery they seized a Christian child, bound him to a cross, and
hung him up. At first they only laughed and jeered at him, but soon, their
passions getting the better of them, they ill-treated the child so that he died
under their hands.
The thing got noised abroad, and resulted in a serious brawl between the Jews
and their Christian neighbors. The authorities then stepped in, and the Jews
had to pay dear for the crime they had perpetrated in sport. (Socrates,
Historia Ecclesiastica, vii. 16; Theophanes, Chronographia, vol. I. P. 129.
Theophanes places the event in the year 408 A.D. From a note in Migne's edition
of Socrates, I learn that in the Alexandrian calendar, which Theophanes used,
the year 408 corresponded to the year which in our reckoning began on
The Christian historian does not mention, and perhaps did not know, the name of
the drunken and jovial festival which ended so tragically; but we can hardly
doubt it was Purim, and that the boy who died on the cross represented Haman.
In mediaeval and modern times many accusations of ritual murders, as they are
called, have been brought against the Jews, and the arguments for and against
the charge have been discussed on both sides with a heat which, however
natural, has tended rather to inflame the passions of the disputants than to
elicit the truth. (For an examination of some of these reported murders, see
M.R. James (Life and Miracles of St. William of
This last circumstance points, if there is any truth
in the accusations, to a connection of the human sacrifice with the Passover,
which falls in this week, rather than with Purim, which falls a month earlier.
Indeed it has often been made a part of the accusation that the blood of the youthful
victims was intended to be used at the Passover.
If all the charges of ritual murder which have been brought against the Jews in
modern times... would suffice to account for an occasional recrudescence of
primitive barbarity among the most degraded part of the Jewish community...Such
customs die hard; it is not the fault of society as a whole if sometimes the
reptile has strength enough left to lift its venomous head and sting.
But between the stage when human sacrifice goes on unabashed in the light of
common day, and the stage when it has been driven out of sight into dark holes
and corners, there intervenes a period during which the custom is slowly
dwindling away under the growing light of knowledge and philanthropy. In this
middle period many subterfuges are resorted to for the sake of preserving the
old ritual in a form which will not offend the new morality.
A common and successful device is to consummate the sacrifice on the person of
a malefactor, whose death at the altar or elsewhere is little likely to excite
pity or indignation, since it partakes of the character of a punishment, and
people recognize that if the miscreant had not been dealt with by the priest,
it would have been needful in the public interest to hand him over to the executioner.
We have seen that in the Rhodian sacrifices to Cronus a condemned criminal was
after a time substituted for an innocent victim; ((Life and Miracles of St.
William of
There are some grounds for thinking that this or something of this sort was
done; but a consideration of them had better be deferred until we have cleared
up some points which still remain obscure in Purim, and in the account which
the Jews give of its origin. In the first place, then, it deserves to be
remarked that the joyous festival of Purim on the fourteenth and fifteenth days
of the month Adar is invariably preceded by a fast, known as the fast of
Esther, on the thirteenth; indeed, some Jews fast for several days before
Purim. (J. Buxtorf, Synagoga Judaica (Bâle, 1661), cap.
Xxix. P. 554; J. Chr. G. Bodenschatz, Kirchliche Verfassung der heutigen Juden
(
In the book of Esther the fast is traditionally explained as a commemoration of
the mourning and lamentation excited among the Jews by the decree of King
Ahasuerus that they should all be massacred on the thirteenth day of the month
Adar; for
"in every province, whithersoever the king's commandment and his decree
came, there was great mourning among the Jews, and fasting, and weeping, and
wailing; and many lay in sackcloth and ashes." And Esther, before she went
into the presence of the king to plead for the lives of her people, "bad
them return answer unto Mordecai, Go, gather together all the Jews that are
present in Shushan, and fast ye for me, and neither eat nor drink three days,
night or day: I also and my maidens will fast in like manner."
Hence fasting and lamentation were ordained as the proper preparation for the
happy feast of Purim which commemorated the great deliverance of the Jews from
the destruction that had threatened them on the thirteenth day of Adar. (Esther
iv. 3 and 16, ix. 31) Now we have seen that, in the opinion of some eminent
modern scholars, the basis of the book of Esther is not history but a
Babylonian myth, which celebrated the triumphs and sufferings of deities rather
than of men.
On this hypothesis, how is the fast that proceeds Purim to be explained? The
best solution appears to be that of Jensen, that the fasting and mourning were
originally for the supposed annual death of a god or hero of the type of Tammuz
or Adonis, whose resurrection on the following day occasioned that outburst of
joy and gladness which is characteristic of Purim. The particular god or hero,
whose death and resurrection thus touched with sorrow and filled with joy the
hearts of his worshipers, may have been, according to Jensen, either the great
hero Gilgamesh, or his comrade and friend Eabani. (So far as I know, Professor
Jensen has not yet published his theory, but he has stated it in letters to
correspondents. See W. Nowack, Lehrbuch der hebräischen Archäologie (Freiburg
I. Baden and Leipsic, 1894), ii. 200; II. Günkel,
Schöpfung und Chaos (Göttingen, 1895), pp. 311 sqq.;
D.G. Wildeboer, in his commentary on Esther, pp. 174 sq. (Kurzer Hand-Commentar
sum Alten Testament, herausgegeben von D. K. Marti, Lieferung 6, Freiburg I.
B., 1898). In the Babylonian calendar the 13th of Adar was so far a fast day
that on it no fish or fowl might be eaten. In one tablet the 13th of Adar is
marked "not good," while the 14th and 15th are marked
"good." Cee C. H. W. Johns, s.v. "Purim," Encyclopedia
biblica, iii, (London, 1902) col. 3980) The doughty deeds and adventures of his
mighty pair are the theme of the longest Babylonian poem that has been as yet
discovered. It is recorded on twelve tablets, and this circumstance has
suggested to some scholars the view that the story may be a solar myth,
descriptive of the sun's annual course through the twelve months or the twelve
signs of the zodiac.
However that may be, the scene of the poem is laid chiefly at the very ancient
Babylonian city of
His comrade Eabani also roused the fury of Ishtar, and was wounded to death.
For twelve days he lingered on a bed of pain, and, when he died, his friend
Gilgamesh mourned and lamented for him, and rested not until he had prevailed
on the god of the dead to suffer the spirit of Eabani to return to the upper
world.
The resurrection of Eabani, recorded on the twelfth tablet,
forms the conclusion of the long poem. (M. Jastrow, The Religion of Babylonia
and Assyria (Boston, U.S.A., 1898), pp. 471 sq., 475 sq., 481-486, 510-512;
L.W. King, Babylonian Religion and Mythology (London, 1899), pp. 146 sqq.; P.
Jensen, Assyrisch-Babylonische Mythen und Epen (Berlin, 1900), pp. 116-273;
R.F. Harper, Assyrian and Babylonian Literature (New York, 1901), pp. 566-582;
Das Gilgamesch-Epos, neu übersetzt von Arthur Ungnad und gemeinverständlich
erklärt von Hugo Gressmann (Göttingen, 1911). Professor Jastrow points out that
though a relation cannot be traced between each of the tablets of the poem and
the corresponding month of the year, such a relation
appears undoubtedly to exist between some of the tablets and the months.
Thus, for example, the sixth tablet describes the affection of Ishtar for
Gilgamesh, and the visit which she paid to Anu, her father in heaven, to
complain of the hero's contemptuous rejectoin of her love. Now the sixth
Babylonian month was called the "Mission of Ishtar," and in it was
held the festival of Tammuz, the hapless lover of the goddess. Again, the story
of the great flood is told in the eleventh tablet, and the eleventh month was
called the "month of rain." See M. Jastrow, The Religion
of Babylonia and Assyria, pp. 484, 510) Jensen's theory is that the death and
resurrection of a mythical being, who combined in himself the features of a
solar god and an ancient king of Erech, were celebrated at the Babylonian
Zakmuk or festival of the New Year, and that the transference of the drama from
Erech, its original seat, to Babylon led naturally to the substitution of
Marduk, the great god of Babylon, for Gilgamesh or Eabani in the part of the
hero. Although Jensen apparently does not identify the Zakmuk with the Sacaea,
a little consideration will shew how well his general theory of Zakmuk fits in
with those features of the Sacaean festival which have emerged in the course of
our enquiry.
At the Sacaean festival, if I am right, a man, who personated a god or hero of
the type of Tammuz or Adonis, enjoyed the favors of a woman, probably a sacred
harlot, who represented the great goddess Ishtar or Astarte; and after he had
thus done his part towards securing, by means of sympathetic magic, the revival
of plant life in spring, he was put to death. We may suppose that the death of
this divine man was mourned over by his worshipers, and especially by women, in
much the same fashion as the women of Jerusalem wept for Tammuz at the gate of
the temple, (Ezekiel viii. 14) and as Syrian damsels mourned the dead Adonis,
while the river ran red with his blood. Such rites appear, in fact, to have
been common all over
At all times the Jews have regarded an oath to the Christians
as not being binding. If this interpretation of the Sacaea is correct,
it is obvious that one important feature of the ceremony is wanting in the
brief notices of the festival that have come down to us.
The death of the man-god at the festival is recorded, but nothing is said of
his resurrection. Yet if he really personated a being of the Adonis or Attis
type, we may feel pretty sure that his dramatic death was followed at a shorter
or longer interval by his dramatic revival, just as at the festivals of Attis
and Adonis the resurrection of the dead god quickly succeeded to his mimic
death. (Adonis, Attis, Osiris, Second Edition, pp. 183 sq., 227)
Here, however, a difficulty presents itself. At the Sacaea the man-god died a
real, not a me mimic death; and in ordinary life the
resurrection even of a man-god is at least not an everyday occurrence. What was
to be done? The man, or rather the god, was undoubtedly dead.
How was he to come to life again? Obviously the best, if not the only way, was
to set another and living man to support the character of the reviving god, and
we may conjecture that this was done. We may suppose that the insignia of
royalty which had adorned the dead man were transferred to his successor, who,
arrayed in them, would be presented to his rejoicing worshipers as their god
come to life again; and by his side would probably be displayed a woman in the
character of his divine consort, the goddess Ishtar or Astarte.
In favor of this hypothesis it may be observed that it at once furnishes a
clear and intelligible explanation of a remarkable feature in the book of
Esther which has not yet, so far as I am aware, been adequately elucidated; I
mean that apparent duplication of the principal characters to which I have
already directed the reader's attention. If I am right, Haman the temporary
king of mortal god who was put to death at the Sacaea; and his rival Mordecai
represents the other temporary king who, on the death of his predecessor, was
invested with his royal insignia, and exhibited to the people as the god come
to life again. Similarly Vashti, the deposed queen in the narrative,
corresponds to the woman who played the part of queen and goddess to the first
mock king, the Haman; and her successful rival, Esther or Ishtar, answers to
the woman who figured as the divine consort of the second mock king, the
Mordecai or Marduk. A trace of the sexual license accorded to the mock king of
the festival seems to be preserved in the statement that King Ahasuerus found
Haman fallen on the bed with Esther and asked, "Will he even force the
queen before me in the house?" (Esther vii. 8)
We have seen that the mock king of the Sacaea did actually possess the right of
using the real king's concubines, and there is much to be said for the view of
Movers that he began his short reign by exercising the right in public.
(Adonis, Attis, Osiris, Second Edition, pp. P. 368) In the parallel ritual of
Adonis the marriage of the goddess with her ill-fated lover was publicly
celebrated the day before his mimic death. (Adonis, Attis, Osiris, Second PT.
VI)
A clear reminiscence of the time when the relation between Esther and Mordecai
was conceived as much more intimate than mere cousin ship appears to be
preserved in some of the Jewish plays acted at Purim, in which Mordecai appears
as the lover of Esther; and this significant indication is confirmed by the
teaching of the rabbis that King Ahasuerus never really knew Esther, but that a
phantom in her likeness lay with him while the real Esther sat on the lap of
Mordecai. (J.J. Schudt, Jüdische Maerkwüdigkeiten (
The Persian setting, in which the author of the book of Esther has framed his
highly-colored picture, naturally suggests that the Jews derived their feast of
Purim not directly from the old Babylonians, but from their Persian conquerors.
Even if this could be demonstrated, it would in no way invalidate the theory
that Purim originated in the Babylonian festival of the Sacaea, since we know
that the Sacaea was celebrated by the Persians. (Dio Chrysostom makes Diogenes
say to Alexander the Great, The festival was mentioned by Ctesias in the second
book of his Persian history (Athenaeus, xiv. 44 p. 639c); and down to the time
of Strabo it was associated with the nominal worship of the Persian goddess
Anaitis (Strabo, xi. 8. 4 and 5, p. 512))
Hence it becomes worth while to enquire whether in the Persian religion we can
detect any traces of a festival akin to the Sacaea or Purim. Here Lagarde has
shown the way by directing attention to the old
Persian ceremony known as the "Ride of the Beardless One." (Lagarde,
"Purim," pp. 51) This was a rite performed both in
A beardless and, if possible, one-eyed buffoon was set naked on an ass, a
horse, or a mule, and conducted in a sort of mock triumph through the streets
of the city. In one hand he held a crow and in the other a fan, with which he
fanned himself, complaining of the heat, while the people pelted him with ice
and snow and drenched him with cold water. He was supposed to drive away the
cold, and to aid him perhaps in discharging this useful function he was fed
with hot food, and hot stuffs were smeared on his body. Riding on his ass and attended
by all the king's household, if the city happened to be the capital, or, if it
was not, by all the retainers of the governor, who were also mounted,
He paraded the streets and extorted contributions. He stopped at the doors of
the rich, and if they did not give him what he asked for, he befouled their
garments with mud or a mixture of red ochre and water, which he carried in an
earthenware pot. If a shopkeeper hesitated a moment to respond to his demands,
the importunate beggar had the right to confiscate all the goods in the shop;
so the tradesmen who saw him bearing down on them, not unnaturally hastened to
anticipate his wants by contributing of the substance before he could board
them.
Everything that he thus collected form break of day to the time of morning
prayers belonged to the king or governor of the city; but everything that he
laid hands on between the first and the second hour of prayer he kept for
himself. After the second prayers he disappeared, and if the people caught him
later in the day they were free to beat him to their heart's content. "In
like manner," proceeds one of the native writers who has described the
custom,
"people at the present time appoint a New Year Lord and make merry. And
this they do because the season, which is the beginning of Azur or March,
coincides with the sun's entry into Aries, for on that day they disport
themselves and rejoice because the winter is over." (Th. Hyde, Historia
religion is veterum Persarum (Oxford, 1700), pp. 183, 249-251; AlbîrûnÏ, The Chronology
of Ancient Nations, translated and edited by Dr. C. Edward Sachau (London,
1879), p. 211)
Now in this harlequin, who rode through the streets attended by all the king's
men, and levying contributions which went either to the royal treasury or to
the pocket of the collector, we recognize the familiar features of the mock or
temporary king, who is invested for a short time with the pomp and privileges
of royalty for reasons which have been already explained. (The Dying God, pp.
148)
The abrupt disappearance of the Persian clown at a certain hour of the day,
coupled with the leave given to the populace to thrash him if they found him
afterwards, points plainly enough to the harder fate that probably awaited him
in former days, when he paid with his life for his brief tenure of a kingly
crown.
The resemblance between his burlesque progress and that of Mordecai through the
streets of Susa is obvious; though the Jewish author of Esther has depicted in
brighter colors the pomp of his hero "in royal apparel of blue and white,
and with a great crown of gold, and with a robe of fine linen and purple,"
riding the king's own charger, and led through the city by one of the king's
most noble princes. (Esther vi. 8. Viii. 15)
The difference between the two scenes is probably not to be explained simply by
the desire of the Jewish writer to shed a halo of glory round the personage
whom he regarded as the deliverer of his people. So long as the temporary king
was a real substitute for the reigning monarch, and had to die sooner or later
in his stead. It was natural that he should be treated with a greater show of
deference, and should simulate his royal brother more closely than a clown who
had nothing worse than a beating to fear when he laid down his office. In short,
after the serious meaning of the custom had been forgotten, and the substitute
was allowed to escape with his life, the high tragedy of the ancient ceremony
would rapidly degenerate into farce. But while the "Ride of the Beardless
One" is, from one point of view, a degenerate copy of the original,
regarded from another point of view, it preserves some features which are
almost certainly primitive, though they do not appear in the kindred Babylonian
and Jewish festivals.
The Persian custom bears the stamp of a popular festivity rather than of a
state ceremonial, and everywhere it seems as if popular festivals, when left to
propagate themselves freely among the folk, reveal their old meaning and
intention more transparently than when they have been adopted into the official
religion and enshrined in a ritual.
The simple thoughts of our simple forefathers are better understood by their
unlettered descendants than by the majority of educated people; their rude
rites are more faithfully preserved and more truly interpreted by a rude
peasantry than by the priest, who wraps up their nakedness in the gorgeous pall
of religious pomp, or by the philosopher, who dissolves their crudities into
the thin air of allegory.
In the present instance the purpose of the "Ride of the Beardless
One" at the beginning of spring is sufficiently obvious; it was meant to
hasten the departure of winter and the approach of summer. We are expressly
told that the clown who went about fanning himself and complaining of the heat,
while the populace snowballed him, was supposed to dispel the cold; and even
without any such assurance we should be justified in inferring as much from his
behavior.
On the principles of homoeopathic or imitative magic, which is little more than
an elaborate system of make-believe, you can make the weather warm by
pretending that it is so; or if you cannot, you may be sure that there is some
person wiser than yourself who can.
Such a wizard, in the estimation of the Persians, was the beardless one-eyed
man who went through the performance I have described; and no doubt his
physical defects were believed to contribute in some occult manner to the
success of the rite. The ceremony was this, as Lagarde acutely perceived, the
oriental equivalent of those popular European customs which celebrate the
advent of spring by representing in a dramatic form the expulsion or defeat of
winter by the victorious summer. (The Dying God, pp. 254)
But whereas in
But why, the reader may ask, should the divine pair be thus duplicated and the
two pairs set in opposition to each other? The answer is suggested by the
popular European celebrations of spring to which I have just adverted. If my
interpretation of these customs is right, the contrast between the summer and
winter, or between the life and death, which figure in effigy or in the persons
of living representatives at the spring ceremonies of our peasantry, is
fundamentally a contrast between the dying or dead vegetation of the old and
the sprouting vegetation of the new year, a contrast which would lose nothing
of its point when, as in ancient Rome and Babylon and Persia, the beginning of
spring was also the beginning of the new year.
In these and in all the ceremonies we have been examining the antagonism is not
between powers of a different order, but between the same power viewed in
different aspects as old and young; it is, in short, nothing but the eternal
and pathetic contrast between youth and age. And as the power or spirit of
vegetation is represented irreligious ritual and popular custom by a human
pair, whether they be called Ishtar and Tammuz, or Venus and Adonis, or the
Queen and King of May, so we may expect to find the old decrepit spirit of the
past year personated by one pair, and the fresh young spirit of the new year by
another. This, if my hypothesis is right, is the ultimate explanation of the
struggle between Haman and Vashti on the one side, and their doubles Mordecai
and Esther on the other.
In the last analysis both Parts stood for the powers that make for the
fertility of plants and perhaps also of animals; (The interpretation here given
of the four principal personages in the book of Esther was suggested by me in
the second edition of this book (1900). It agrees substantially with the one
which has since been adopted yb Professor H. Zimmern (in E. Schrader's Die
Keilinschriften und das Alte Testament, Berlin, 1902, p. 19), and by Professor
P. Haupt (Purim, Leipsic, 1906, pp. 21)) but the one pair embodied the failing
energies of the past, and the other the rigorous and growing energies of the
coming year. Both powers, on my hypothesis, were personified not merely in
myth, but in custom; for year by year a human couple undertook to quicken the
life of nature by a union in which as in a microcosm, the loves of tree and
plant, of herb and flower, of bird and beast were supposed in some mystic
fashion to be summed up. (In this connection it deserves to be noted that among
the anicent Persians marriages are said to have been usually celebrated at the
vernal equinox (Strabo, xv. 3. 17, p. 733))
Originally, we may conjecture, such couples exercised their functions for a
whole year, on the conclusion of which the male partner; the divine king, was
put to death; but in historical times it seems that, as a rule, the human god;
the Saturn, Zoganes, Tammuz, or whatever he was called, enjoyed his divine
privileges, and discharged his divine duties only for a short part of the year.
This curtailment of his reign on the earth was probably introduced at the time
when the old hereditary divinities or defied kings contrived to shift the most
painful part of their duties to a substitute, whether that substitute was a son
or a slave or a malefactor. Having to die as a king, it was necessary that the
substitute should also live as a king for a season; but the real monarch would
naturally restrict within the narrowest limits both of time and of power a
reign which, so long as it lasted, necessarily encroached upon and indeed
superseded his own. (The five days' duration of the mock king's reign may
possibly have been an intercalary period introduced, as in ancient Egypt and
Mexico, of the purpose of equalizing a year of 360 days & twelve months of
30 days each) to a solar year reckoned at 365 days. See above, pp. 339)
What became of the divine king's female partner, the human goddess who shared
his bed and transmitted his beneficent energies to the rest of nature, we
cannot say. So far as I am aware, there is little or no evidence that she like
him suffered death when her primary function was discharged. (However, the
legend that Semiramis burned herself on a pyre in Babylon for grief at the loss
of a favorite horse (Hyginus, Fab. 243; compare Pliny, Nat. Hist. viii. 155) may
perhaps point t o an old custom of compelling the human representative of the
goddess to perish in the flames.
We have seen above that one of the lovers of Ishtar had the form of a horse.
Hence the legend recorded by Hyginus is a fresh link in the chain of evidence
which binds Semiramis to Ishtar) The nature of maternity suggests an obvious
reason for sparing her a little longer, till that mysterious law, which links
together woman's life with the changing aspects of the nightly sky, had been
fulfilled by the birth of an infant god, who should in his turn, reared perhaps
by her tender care, grew up to live and die for the world.
We may now sum up the general results of the enquiry which we have pursued in
the present chapter. We have found evidence that festivals of the type of the
Saturnalia, of a man in the character of a god, were at one time held all over
the ancient world from
When the Jews have been wandering around for a whole week, soon they cheat a
Christian here and there, they commonly gather together on their Sabbath day
and boast of their knavish tricks among themselves, whereupon the other Jews
declare...they shall take the heart from out of the body of a Christian, and
say furthermore...the best of the Christians should be beaten to death.
Originally his term of office appears to have been limited to a year, on the
conclusion of which he was put to death; but in time he contrived by force or
craft to extend his reign and sometimes to procure a substitute, who after a
shortand more or less nominal tenure of the crown was slain in his stead. At
first the substitute for the divine father was probably the divine son, but
afterwards this rule was no longer insisted on, and still later the growth of a
human feeling demanded that the victim should always be a condemned criminal.
In this advanced stage of degernation it is no wonder if th
elight of divinity suffered eclipse, and many should fail to detect the god in
the malefactor. Yet the downward career of fallen deity does not stop here;
even a criminal comes to be thought too good to personate a god on the gallows
or in the fire; and then there is nothing left but to make up a
more or less grotesque effigy, and so to hang, burn, or otherwise destroy the god
in the person of this sorry representative.
By this time the original meaning of the ceremony may be so completely
forgotten that the puppet is supposed to represent some historical personage,
who earned the hatred and contempt of his fellows in his life, and whose memory
has ever since been held up to eternal execration by the annual destruction of
his effigy. The figures of Haman, of the Carnival, and of Winter or Death which
are or used to be annually destroyed in spring by Jews, Catholics, and the
peasants of Central Europe respectively, appear to be all lineal descendants of
those human incarnations of the powers of nature whose life and death were
deemed essential to the welfare of mankind. But of the three the only one which
has preserved a clear trace of its original meaning is the effigy of Winter or Death.
In others the ancient significance of the custom as a magical ceremony designed
to direct the course of nature has been almost wholly obscured by a thick after
growth of legend and myth. The cause of this distinction is that, whereas the
practice of destroying an effigy of Winter or Death has been handed down from
time immoral through generations of simple peasants, the festivals of Purim and
the Carnival, as well as their Babylonian and Italian prototypes,
the Sacaea and the Saturnalia, were for centuries domesticated in cities, where
they were necessarily exposed to those thousand transforming and disintegrating
currents of speculation and enquiry, of priestcraft and policy, which roll
their turbid waters through the busy haunts of men, but leave undefiled the
limpid springs of mythic fancy in the country.
If there is any truth in the analysis of the Saturnaila and kindred festivals
which I have now brought to a close, it seems to point to a remarkable
homogeneity of civilization throughout
All these things appear to hang together; all of them may, perhaps, be regarded
as the shattered remnants of a uniform zone of religion and society which at a
remote era belted the
It is possible that such sacrifices of deified men, performed for the salvation
of the world, may have helped to beget the notion that the universe or some
part of it was originally created out of the bodies of gods offered up in
sacrifice. Certainly it is curious that notions of this sort meet us precisely
in parts of the world where such sacrifices appear to have been regularly
accomplished. Thus in ancient Mexico, where the sacrifice of human beings in
the character of gods formed a conspicuous feature of the national religion, it
is said that in the beginning, when as yet the light of day was not, the gods
created the sun to illumine the earth by voluntarily burning themselves in the
fire, leaping one after the other into the flames of a great furnace. (B. De
Sahagun, Histoire Gènèrale des Choses de la Nouvelle Espagne, traduite par D.
Jourdanet et R. Simeon (Parts, 1880), pp. 478-480. Compare E. Seler,
Altmexikanische Studien, ii. (
Again, in the Babylonian Genesis the great god Bel crated the world by cleaving
the female monster Tiamat in twain and using the severed halves of her body to
form the heaven and the earth. Afterwards, perceiving that the earth was waste
and void, he obligingly ordered one of the gods to cut off his, the Creator's,
head, and with the flowing blood mixed with clay he kneaded a paste out of
which he molded men and animals. (Berosus, quoted by Eusebius, Chronicorum
liber prior, ed. A. Schoene (Berlin, 1875), coll. 14-18; id., in Fragmenta
Historicorum Graecorum, ed. C. Muller, ii. 497 sq; P. Jensen,
Assyrisch-Babylonische Mythen und Epen (Berlin, 1900), pp. 2; L. W. King,
Babylonian Religion and Mythology (London, 1899), pp. 54; M. Jastrow, The
Religion of Babylonia and Assyria (Boston, U.S.A., 1898), pp. 408; H. Zimmern,
in E. Schrader's Die Keilinschriften und das alte Testament (Berlin, 1902), p.
488; M.J. Lagrange, Etudes sur les Religions Sèmitiques (Parts, 1905), p. 366;
R. W. Rogers, Cuneiform Parallels to the Old Testament (Oxford, preface dated
1911), p. 31, 36. In the Hebrew account of the creation (Genesis 1:2) "the
deep" is a reminiscence of the Babylonian mythical monster Tiamt)
Similarly in a hymn of the Rig Veda we read how the gods created the world out
of the dismembered body of the great primordial giant Purushu. The sky was made
out of his head, the earth out of his feet, the sun out of his eye, and the
moon out of his mind; animals and men were also engendered from his dripping
fat or his limbs, and the great gods Indra and Agni sprang from his mouth.
(Hymns of the Rig Ved, x. 90 (vol. Iv. Pp. 289-293 of R.T.H. Griffith's translation,
The crude, nay savage, account of creation thus set forth by the poet was
retained by the Brahman doctors of a later age and refined by them into a
subtle theory of sacrifice in general. According to them the world was not only
created in the beginning by the sacrifice of the creator Prajapati, the Lord of
Creatures; to this day it is renewed and preserved solely by a repetition of
that mystic sacrifice in the daily sacrificial ritual celebrated by the
Brahmans. Every day the body of the Creator and Savior is broken anew, and
every day it is pieced together for the restoration and conservation of a
universe which otherwise must dissolve and be shattered into fragments. Thus is
the world continually created afresh by the self-sacrifice of the deity; and,
wonderful to relate, the priest who offers the sacrifice identifies himself
with the Creator, and so by the very act of sacrificing renews the universe and
keeps up uninterrupted the revolution of time and matter.
All things depend on his beneficent, nay divine activity, from the heaven above
to the earth beneath, from the greatest god to the meanest worm, from the sun
and moon to the humblest blade of grass and the minutest particle of dust.
Happily this grandiose theory of sacrifice as a process essential to the
salvation of the world does not oblige the priest to imitate his glorious
prototype by dismembering his own body and shedding his blood on the altar; on
the contrary a comfortable corollary deduced form it holds out to him the
pleasing prospect of living for the unspeakable benefit of society to a good
old age, indeed of stretching out the brief span of human existence to a full
hundred years. (The Satapatha Brâhmana, translated by Julius Eggeling, Part iv. (
Jewish Human Sacrifice
The ancient Khazar Jews along with other of that
Near East era followed a common custom of human sacrifice. The practice was to
burn a young person upon an altar called a Tophet. The Old Testament of the
Bible mentions this practice and condemns it. Around the Tophet altar, drums
would be beaten loudly to drown out the cries of the children being burned
alive. In the days of Ancient Israel the Priests of Baal would blow trumpets to
drown out their screams. The Carthaginians also were worshipers of Baal and
sacrificed children on a massive scale. When faced with defeat in
In Excavations at
Photographs of the children's bodies are published in Macalister's book,
although the book itself, like most works which attest to the criminal nature
of the Jews, is now almost unobtainable. It is classified as a rare book, and
most rare book dealers are Jews.
In the Bible, Isaiah 57:3-5 the prophet, talking of the Jews of his day says:
"But draw near hither, ye sons of the sorceress, the seed of the adulterer
and the whore. Against whom do ye sport yourselves? against
whom make ye a wide mouth, and draw out the tongue? are
ye not children of transgression, a seed of falsehood, Enflaming yourselves
with idols under every green tree, slaying the children in the valleys under
the clefts of the rocks?"
By the phrase, "ye sons of the sorceress," Isaiah calls attention to
the fact that Jewish ritual murder is a black magic rite. It is customary for
the rabbi, as he drinks blood, to invoke the presence of Satan, who will then
presumably carry out the wishes of the Jews. The drinkers of blood also swear
eternal obedience to Satan during the blood rite.
Isaiah also calls attention to the fact that here the children are slain
"under the cleft of the rocks." This refers to the Jewish ban against
burying the slain gentile child, and to hiding the body in the rocks in the
hopes that the gentiles will not discover their crime.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VIII, page 653, published in 1904, says,
"The fact, therefore, now generally accepted by critical scholars, is that
in the last days of the kingdom, human sacrifices were offered to Yhwh (Yahu,
or Jehovah), as King of Counsellor of the Nation, and that the Prophets
disapproved of it."
Yahu also is interchangeable with Baal, the Golden Idol, and Satan, who is
thought to have been a minor god of the Jews, and an instrument of Baal. The
two themes of Jewish history are blood and gold, and every practice of the Jews
is inextricably bound up with these two factors.
Let me briefly quote Dr. Vladimir Ivanovich Dal from the above-cited book on
these crimes:
"It was not just one group of people who have accused Jews of committing
such deplorable acts; Jews were accused many times of that in court by a
variety of people. On the whole, there was not only their own confession in
addition to other evidence; but there were such examples where the Jews were
exposed and, consequently, had recognized themselves as being true. One such
event should obviously be enough for people to acknowledge the real existence
of such villainous human mutilation, but the defenders of Jews say something
quite different: The confession was forced by torture and, therefore, proves
nothing. Assuming, however, this argument is true, too, and believing all that
was ever said and written on this problem in favor of Jews, with respect to
forced confessions, there is still one circumstance that will remain, which is
never paid enough attention.
This circumstance not only remains as unexplained by Jews but also is the proof
of the crime itself--namely, it is not doubtful that, from time to time, the
corpses of babies, who were missing, were eventually discovered in such
distorted conditions and with such signs of external violence that they
attested to images of excruciatingly painful deaths. This is the
kind of murder for which the Jews are accused. Also, the incidents of
this nature exclusively occurred only in places where the Jews live. We
must ask ourselves: In what type of circumstance can we attribute the renewed
cases of babies who suffered painful deaths--babies who were carefully tortured
up to the point of their tragic deaths--if an accusation is not
fair? What reason can we invent for the villainous torture of a
baby, if it is not done for religious mutilation? The external signs on corpses
indicate each time this is discovered, positively, that the death could not be
accidental in any case but intentional. And, it is obvious that
these injuries sustained by the babies are deliberately done and take place
over a long time: The whole body is poked or pricked. Then, scraps of
skin are cut.
The tongue was often cut out. The intimate parts of boys are either cut
out, or the boys were circumcised. Occasionally, other parts of the body are
cut out, and the palms are punctured. Signs of bruises from tight bandages put
on and removed again are not uncommon; often, the entire skin has abrasions as
if it was burnt or had something rubbing against it. Sometimes, the
corpse was even washed, with it being discovered
without any blood in it; nor was there any blood on the undergarments or
clothes, demonstrating that they were taken off during the murder and,
afterwards, put on again. The parents and siblings of babies who have
experienced such tragic deaths wonder: For what possible reason would people
commit such deplorable acts to innocent babies? Without a purpose, it could
never be done; yet it continues to happen repeatedly over time. The ordinary
killer, in any case, would be satisfied with one murder. But a murderer who
kills for some type of mysterious, important purpose cannot be rejected here.
The weak, unsatisfactory searching of investigators, the different tricks of
Jews, their impudent and stubborn denial, not infrequently a bribery, the
confidence by the majority of educated people in that an accusation is merely
the infamous slander and, finally, the humanity of our criminal laws--all these
things saved the Jewish culprits, nearly every time, from deserved
execution. And they--by using their machinations, by giving false
oath assurances of innocence, and by using false propaganda that suggested such
accusations were merely theresult of accomplished injustice with slander built
on them--almost always were well prepared for such accusations. The
Jews punished those who demonstrated credible evidence against them. In
the year 1817 [in
One expose of the subject of Ritual Murder was written in great detail by
Arnold S. Leese, entitled My Irrelevant Defense on Jewish Ritual Murder,
"Let a Jew speak for us here: 'Bernard Lazare, a Jew who was stated
(Jewish Encyclopedia, 1904, Vol.
Thus Lazare tries to absolve the Jews of the ritual murder charge by saying
that they were guilty, but that it was done from motives of sorcery, rather
than as a key element in the practice of the Jewish religion. He apparently has
not read the Bible, or noted Isaiah's denunciations of the Jews as sorcerers
and murderers of children. Of course the Jews killed children during their
rites of sorcery, as Lazare admits, but these horrors were committed as
essential rites of the Jewish religion.
Dr. Eric Bischoff, a famous German Jewish scholar, has found the explicit
authorization of the practice of Jewish ritual murder in the Thikunne Zohar,
Edition Berdiwetsch, 88b, a book of cabalistic ritual, as follows:
"Furthermore, there is a commandment pertaining to the killing of
strangers, who are like beasts. This killing has to be done in the lawful
(Jewish) method. Those who do not ascribe themselves to the Jewish religious
law must be offered up as sacrifices to the (Jews) High God (Satan)."
Murders of Christian children by the Jews usually occur during the important
feast-days, Purim, one month before Easter, and Passover, at Easter. Jewish law
prescribes that the gentile victim at Purim, a Jewish holiday as the Jewish
victory over the gentiles, may be an adult.
Also if no gentile victim can be obtained, dried blood from a previous victim
may be used. However, a Jewish law is quite specific that the victim at
Passover must be a White Child (as the Whites are the True Israelites, and the
Jews know it) under seven years of age, who must be bled white, crowned with
thorns, tortured, beaten, stabbed, and finally given the last blow by being
wounded in the side, the dagger prescribed to be in the hands of a rabbi, in a
complete re-enactment of the crucifixion of Christ.
This vindictive ceremony reassures the Jews that even if a few of the gentiles
are alerted to the nature of this people, as Christ talked against them, the
Jews will always win out by murdering the critic. Consequently, many critics of
the Jews are slain in these terrible ceremonies. In the
The elder Lindbergh had published a book which was burned by Federal agents
during World War I, even though he was a Congressman at the time. He was well
aware of the nature of the Jewish problem. Now that his son was a world-famous
man, after his feat of flying alone across the
They had already planned World War II, in which
Hauptmann's defense was that a Jew named Isidor Fisch had hired him to do some
carpenter work, and had paid him with the bills which proved to be from the
Lindbergh ransom money. Although the existence of Fisch was proven, he could
not be located during the trial. The court was like the one which had convicted
Jesus, for it only accepted evidence which the Jews allowed to be presented. In
reality, of course, one cannot believe anything which is accepted as evidence
in an American court, due to the facility of the Jews for manufacturing
evidence and due to the prevalence of Jewish lawyers and judges in all American
court rooms. This was also the first of many efforts of the Jews to vilify the
Germans so that
A book entitled The Jew, the Gypsy, and El Islam, indicates that the Talmudic
god of the Jews [Not the God of Christians] is a blood loving god:
"The Talmud declares that there are two kinds of blood pleasing to the
lord, viz: (1) that of Paschal holocaust [Easter sacrifice & the Feast of
Purim]; (2) that of circumcision."
According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. IV., p. 90, when performing
the operation of circumcision on children, the mohel (Jewish Rabbi who does the
circumcision):
"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in
the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine
and blood into a receptacle provided."
Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part of the ceremony
of circumcising Jewish males. According to The Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. VI,
page 99, when performing the circumcision, the mohel, or circumciser,
"takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in
the operation and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and
blood into a receptacle provided."
What The Jewish Encyclopedia does not tell us is that this mixture of wine and
blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such a weird blood rite,
save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in the deepest jungles of the
The story, is that Xeroxes, King of Persia, became
enamored with a Jewess, Esther a prostitute, and made her Queen in place of his
rightful wife. Haman, the King's minister, complained to him of the conduct of
the Jews who, he said, did not keep the laws of the land, and obtained from the
King an order to slay them.
Esther pleaded with the King and prevailed upon him to summon Haman to a
banquet. There, Queen Esther further prevailed upon the King to spare the Jews
and hang Haman on a gallows prepared for the execution of her guardian. Instead
of the Jews being destroyed, their enemies were slaughtered, including Haman's
ten sons, who were hanged. This feast is often celebrated by an exhibition of
gluttony, intoxication, and curses on the memory of Haman; and even to this day
the Jewish bakers make cakes, laced with dried Christian blood, in the shape of
human ears which are eaten by the Jews on this day, and are called
"Haman's Ears," revealing once again the inherent hate and barbarism
of the Jews in our midst.
When a Ritual Sacrifice occurs at Purim, it is usually that of an adult
Christian who was murdered for his blood; the blood is then dried and the
powder mixed into triangular cakes for eating; it is possible that the dried
blood of a Purim Sacrifice might sometimes be used for the following Passover.
When a Ritual Sacrifice is done at Passover, it is usually that of a Christian
child under seven years old, as perfect a specimen as possible, who is not only
bled white, but crucified, sometimes circumcised and crowned with thorns,
tortured, beaten, stabbed, and sometimes finished off by wounding in the side
in imitation of the murder of Christ. The blood taken from the child is then
mixed either in the powdered state or otherwise into the Passover bread.
Another festival at which Ritual Sacrifice has sometimes been indulged in is
Chanucah (Which is called Hanukkah today) which occurs in December,
commemorating the recovery of
Although hate is the principal motive, superstitious traditions are also involved, one being the association of
blood-sacrifices with the idea of atonement; some Jews have confessed that
Jewry cannot be saved unless every year the blood of a Christian is obtained
for the purpose of ritual consumption.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1903, Vol. III, pp. 266-267, gives a list of
Accusations of Ritual Murder (Sacrifices) made against the Jews through the
centuries; 122 cases are listed in chronological order, and no less than 39 of
them were made in the 19th century!
There were far more than double the number of Blood Accusations made in the
19th century than in any previous century, according to this authoritative
Jewish list.
The list of Ritual Murder Accusations made by a converted Jew, Cesare
Algranati, in 1913, and published in Cahiers Romains; there are listed 101
accusations, or which 28 were made in the 19th century and only 73 for all the
eight preceding centuries! Even the Jew Roth gives the argument away, for he
says: "The nineteenth century proved little less credulous than those
which proceeded it." (Ritual Murder Libel and The
Jew, 1935)
The fact that the charges increase in number as the age becomes more and more
enlightened is particularly significant, because the Jewish Money Power and its
silencing activities are more developed than ever before and has been
instrumental in reducing the number of charges by covering them up. It is
absolutely amazing that there are always influential Judeo-Christian men/women
who can be induced, when Jewish interests are at stake, will declare to all the world that there is nothing improper in not
attempting to examine these charges of Ritual Sacrifice by the Jews; and to
declare them as lies by "Anti-Semitic" authors.
Just as it is impossible for the lamb to abandon its
frisking and leaping, or the serpent its stinging, so the Jew cannot abandon
his lust for murdering Christians whenever he can. Yet the record is clear if
one is inclined to study and learn. Following are few such examples:
"Then the Jews in Cyrene (on the modern Tripoli coast of North Africa)
choosing as their leader one Andreas, slew the Romans and Greeks, and devoured
their bodies, drank the blood, clothed themselves in the flayed skins, and
sawed many in half from the head downwards; some they threw to wild beasts and
others were compelled to fight in single combat, so that in all 220,000 were
killed. In
The second:
"Baena (
"La Campana (Seville): Reds, led by a woman, Concepcion Velarde Caraballo,
who either killed or was responsible for killing 11 persons in prison. The
prisoners were fired on until they fell, covered with petrol, and set on fire.
Some were still writhing in the flames when the city was entered. Lore
From The Magick, in Paris, France:
"...it was the theory of the ancient (Jewish) magicians that any living
being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and
health of the animal (non-Jews), and in quality according to its mental and
moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly.
The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the
case may be, so that its energy cannot escape...For the highest spiritual
working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and
purest force. A (Christian) male child of perfect innocence and high
intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim." (Magick, by
Master Therion, published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, Paris, France)
A footnote on p. 95 says: "(4) It appears from the Magical Records of (the
Jew) Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average
about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928."
Even today the Jewish sects who keep the Passover by solar computation, indulge
in these bloody sacrifices of Christians on that feast-day; an account is given
of a visit to the scene of sacrifice on Mount Gerizim in this century, and
these words were used:
"I have heard the wild, primitive scream of triumph as the knife is
withdrawn from the neck of the (Christian) lamb of sacrifice."
A paragraph from The B'nai B'rith Messenger, 1936:
"The sophisticated Pharisee (Jew) of the 20th century unceasingly gives
thanks that he has outgrown the fables and rituals of the Ancients. The
worldly-wise man loves the evident and is exasperated by that which is not evident.
Plutocrat and proletarian alike regard themselves a victimized by that person
whose words or actions they do not understand. We love the obvious because it
flatters us, and hate the mysterious because it damns our intelligence with
faint praise. Riddles are irksome. (Which is why Christ
always spoke in parables when speaking before the Jewish Pharisees. They
did not like it, did not understand the parables and He knew it) The modern cry is for facts. Yet, with facts for his fetish,
the modernist is more foolish than his forebears. Decrying superstition, he is
most superstitious; rejecting fancies, he is the fanciful product of a
fictitious age. The modern world is bored with its own importance; life itself
has become a botheration. Suffering from chronic
ennui, how can a world ever become interested in anything but itself? Smothered
in their self-complacency, these all-sufficient ones ask for facts. But what
facts are there that fools can understand? How can the helpless superficial
grasp the hopelessly profound, for are not realities reserved for the wise
(Jews)?"
Although this paragraph is clothed in nonsense it is a picture of a Ritual
Sacrifice, with the victim crucified. And is merely showing the contempt the
Jew has for Christians because they cannot understand this type of wording.
Following in chronological order, where the death of the victim is perpetrated
by the Jews; and in light of the show by Ophra Winfry in 1989 we can clearly
see that there many cases of Ritual Sacrifice by Jews have been unsuspected and
undiscovered up to today, 1995, and will continue for years to come.
The earliest of historians, Herodotus, Informs us about the Jewish cult of
human sacrifice. He writes: "The Jews sacrificed humans to their god
Moloch." (Herodotus, Vol. II, p. 45) Christ said to the Jews: "Your
father was a murderer from the beginning." By this He meant Moloch-Jahweh,
the supreme Jewish devil. Also the prophets